Watts of Power Foundation
This living dashboard shows how the Watts of Power Foundation recruits, prepares, and sustains educators while expanding opportunity for students and communities. Explore the reach, progress, and collective impact of our growing village.
Reporting period: FY 2025-26 Annual (through June 30, 2026)
Last updated: August 27, 2026
About this data: All results are presented in aggregate. Small groups are withheld to protect individual privacy.
Totals across all Watts of Power Foundation fellowship programs for the reporting period above.
41
Under review
833
29
Reach by program. Figures we have not yet verified for this period are labeled rather than shown as zero, measures that do not apply to a program are marked “Not applicable,” and any group smaller than our privacy threshold is withheld.
| Program | Fellows | Retained | Retention | Students reached |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Village Initiative | 30 | Under review | Under review | 833 |
| TVI Rise | 11 | 11 | 100% | Not reported this period |
| The Village Network | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not reported this period |
Where fellows sit along the pathway into teaching, and the credentials they are pursuing. Counts are aggregate totals for the reporting period.
Aggregate composition of the fellows we serve. Any category smaller than our privacy threshold is withheld.
Findings below are approved for public release, drawn from aggregated fellow surveys. Each is self-reported and reflects groups of at least 5 respondents. No individual response is published.
Mean 6.2/7; 67% selected the highest response
self-reported, aggregated12 respondents
What this does not show: Self-reported experience evidence from a single historical survey; small cohort; historical wording differs from current Core Pulse belonging measures.
Mean 7.0/7; 100% selected the highest response
self-reported, aggregated5 respondents
What this does not show: Very small sample (5 responses); single-item measure; meets the 5-response public reporting threshold but should always appear alongside the Cohort 2 primary indicator.
End-of-year belonging 6.2-7.0/7 across two cohorts (67–100% selected the highest response); orientation support-clarity 4.3/5
pattern across surveys
What this does not show: Self-reported experience evidence across distinct instruments; not a validated repeated measure.
Mean 5.0/5; 100% selected the highest response
self-reported, aggregated7 respondents
What this does not show: Very small sample concentrated in 2026; self-reported intention only. Domain labeled Emerging Historical Evidence; must be paired conceptually with administrative credential/persistence data without claiming causation.
Mean 6.9/7; 86% selected the highest response
self-reported, aggregated14 respondents
What this does not show: Reported learning gain only; no classroom observation, student outcome, or documented application data exists historically.
Mean 6.7/7; 79% selected the highest response
self-reported, aggregated14 respondents
What this does not show: Reported learning gain only; classroom application not historically measured.
Mean 6.8/7; 75% selected the highest response
self-reported, aggregated12 respondents
What this does not show: Reported learning gain only; single-cohort end-of-year instrument.
Knowledge acquisition averaging 6.3-7.0/7 across six-plus instruments; several sessions at 100% selected the highest response
pattern across surveys
What this does not show: Reported learning and confidence gains; no classroom observation, student outcome, or documented application data exists historically.
Your support keeps fellows in the classroom, supported, and building wealth in the communities they serve.